A DOUBLE NEGATIVE EQUALS A POSITIVE: A Fake PCR Test to Fake the Fake PCR Test
PANDEMIC WRITINGS, Melbourne, Australia (2020-2022): piece originally published May 9, 2021
There are concerns India's 'double-mutant' viral strain will enter Australia once the repatriation flights begin.
This disregards the fact that the actual "mutant" responsible for the Indian "second wave" is supposedly the "London mutant” — originating in London, Kent, suspiciously like the AstraZeneca vaccine jabbed into 120 million Indians before their "second wave" mysteriously commenced.
However, these fears are well founded, as they are surely based on an expected outcome: a media "fear" reveals a veiled plan.
The pandemic is expected to continue by all means possible.
Further "outbreaks" are not only anticipated — they are purposely created: whether real (vaccine generated), or media propagated.
In an inversion of reality, the concern underpinning this 'fear' is the claim that a percentage of the 9000 Australians hoping to return might have paid $35 dollars for a 'juugad’ — a fake PCR test that produces a 'false negative.'
The obvious assumption is that they may actually be positive, although they falsely tested negative; much like all those who were 'tested positive' with the "real" PCR tests, who were most likely negative (false positives).
Surely his is an ironic nod to the falsified pandemic reality that the official PCR test methodology has been churning out?
Australia, particularly Victoria, were deliberately calibrating their PCR testing to yield a "pandemic of false positives," with each test amplifying potential viral molecules between 40-45 cycles — giving a potential 'false positive' outcome of 89-94%.
It might actually be true that these 'juugad' fake PCR tests, despite being configured to produce 'false negatives,' might actually produce the occasional 'true positive' at a similarly absurd inverse percentage of 11-6%?
Imagine that!
Anything is possible when observing the absurdist antics of the ever-zany always-irrational Clown Town-planners.
Fauci himself has stated that the cycle-threshold should be 34 or below. "If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, the chances of it being replication-competent are minuscule.'
Thus, the chances of Australia's current total of 30,000 'positive cases' actually being true 'positive cases' (determined using the 40-45 PCR cycles) — is equally minuscule.
On this basis alone, with true knowledge and insight — all such genuine fear relating to the "pandemic" should be truly nothing other than...
...minuscule.