"BREAKTHROUGH CASES": When The Vaccinated Still Get the Virus, Vaccines Fail, and How The CDC Are Attempting to Hide It All
PANDEMIC WRITINGS, Melbourne, Australia (2020-2022): piece originally published May 17, 2021
The decisions made by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) are indicative of decisions that are being implemented by health authorities worldwide. Aligned with WHO, and utterly complicit in coordinating all aspects of the "official pandemic narrative," a CDC release, or website update, is undoubtedly a revelation of what is being observed in countries everywhere.
The CDC is acknowledging on their website that 'there will be a small percentage of people who are fully vaccinated who still get sick, are hospitalised, or die from COVID-19.' They also admit that, 'there is some evidence that vaccination may make illness less severe,' but do not confirm that vaccination stops transmission, inoculates, or actually protects against COVID.
'Some evidence" is not very convincing.
Indeed, bizarrely, the CDC still recommends:
'...that fully vaccinated people continue to take steps to protect themselves and others in many situations, like wearing a mask, maintaining an appropriate social distance from others, avoiding crowds and poorly ventilated spaces, and washing their hands often.'
Basically, the official CDC advice is that the vaccinated should still observe all prior precautions, and behave exactly as if they had not received their shots. It would seem that such “jabbed” individuals have neither reduced their risk, nor improved their plight in the slightest.
Truthfully — it is because they have not.
BREAKTHROUGH CASES AND MEANINGLESS “VARIATIONS”
The CDC have also cautioned that a small number of those vaccinated will experience a rare "breakthrough" case, as 'vaccines are not 100% effective.'
A "breakthrough case" occurs when an individual tests positive to COVID despite being deemed inoculated after receiving the required sequence of shots. To acquire post-vaccinated infection is considered a "breaking-through" of the protection afforded by vaccination.
Such cases are supposedly the result of variations, but each variation is a mere 0.3% mutation from the original strand, (according to former Pfizer Vice President, Mike Yeadon*) which means it is essentially 99.7% similar to the original — a clinically identical virus. This is significant, as T cells of those previously infected by SARS-CoV (SARS) in 2003 (a similar precursor coronavirus that is 20% different to COVID-19 aka SARS-CoV-2) not only recognised SARS-CoV in the present day (indicating lasting natural immunity) but, according to scientists testing the T cells in blood samples — they were also immune to SAR-CoV-2 (despite the whopping 20% mutated difference). The T cells had no difficulty recognising and reacting and conferring immunity.
Thus, recovered SARS patients from 2003 had a lasting T cell immunity to all coronaviruses, including COVID-19.
Essentially, a vaccine produced for COVID-19, if truly effective, should have absolutely no difficulty in also inoculating against all minor mutations of 0.3%. This infinitesimal percentile change should be within the covered capacity range. However, these vaccines do not, as they evidently do not protect against the supposed original strain of COVID-19 (and those emerging 0.3% mutations that are clinically identical.)
Quite simply: all current "mutations" are clinically identical to the original strain, and any claim of a variant “breaking through” protection is an admission that the vaccine does not work as promoted — the variation "breakthrough" claim is an official excuse to conceal lack of general vaccine efficacy against COVID-19.
CDC’s NATIONAL BREAKTHROUGH DATABASE AND HOW THEY NOW DETERMINE COUNTABLE CASES
It would seem that such "breakthroughs" have neither been 'small' in number, and thus not 'rare' in occurrence — and so the CDC has devised an official protocol to obfuscate evidence of monumental vaccine failure.
In an endeavour to perpetuate the perception that the vaccination campaign is successful, the CDC has 'developed a national COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough REDCap database.' One would assume that this is for transparency purposes, but the means of classifying and recording "breakthrough" cases reveals the deception.
According to the CDC, from May 14, they are transitioning to only reporting "breakthough” infection of patients ‘who died or were hospitalised.’ Supposedly, this is ‘to maximise the quality of the data collected on the cases of greatest clinical and public health importance...’
However, the great majority of those who contract COVID-19 were neither hospitalised, nor died, and this will also be true of those who are supposedly vaccinated who then get infected. Such a drastic change in official reporting is inherently disingenuous, and serves to conceal the true number of those who will test positive despite being vaccinated. This will not ‘maximise the quality of data,’ but has been purposely implemented to ensure the very concealment of data that might reflect the majority of actual "breakthrough" cases. The true number would conclusively reveal the worthlessness of vaccination.
This is clearly a strategic deception bolstering support for the ongoing Vaccine Agenda.
LOWERING THE PCR CYCLES FOR BREAKTHROUGH CASES ONLY (28-cycles or less for “breakthroughs” amongst vaccinated; 40-45 cycles still recommended for unvaccinated cases)
The CDC has advised that the PCR test cycles for “breakthroughs” must now be calibrated at below 28-cycles, an amplification rate that will ensure few, if any ‘false positives.’ This is great if the intent is to lower the previous rate of positive case detection; inversely, it also reveals the exact means they have used to generate increasingly more “positive cases.”
With COVID-19 positive cases, the PCR tests were calibrated at 40-45 cycles to effectively harvest unlimited false positives (89-94% of the time), and to generate the ever increasing “cases numbers.”
The daily media promotion of these accumulating "case numbers” had been crucial to establish the “threat,” and to project a convincing pandemic illusion.
Now it is being used in reverse, to reverse the success of the previous PCR illusion in the instance of the vaccinated.
This lower cycle PCR methodology will suppress the true number of "breakthrough" cases — that is the intent.
A RETURN TO NORMAL — IS NOW.
Given that a 'return to normal' is supposedly predicated on everyone being vaccinated and rendered immune — these anomalous “breakthroughs” are not anomalies; but, rather, represent the breaking-through of the truth into reality.
Many fully vaccinated individuals are inexplicably contracting COVID-19. The only logical conclusion is that these vaccines do not work 100% of the time; and probably not most of the time... if any of the time.
POSTSCRIPT: Five days later, I received notification that this post had come under the direct scrutiny of the notorious truth-shredders at PolitiFact.
The Pharma-funded Ministry of unTruth subjected my piece to a superficial analysis, failing to debunk or illuminate any actual inconsistencies or false claims — but declared that a usage of the misspelling of 'v8ccine' was a standard attempt to evade fact-checkers (how about: it is a strategic measure adopted to evade the ham-fisted totalitarian censorship by the algorithmic driftnet of the omnipresent truth-cancellers?)
They also casually mentioned that a phone call to the CDC was sufficient to debunk my whole article:
'As for the claims of a CDC cover-up?
"Completely false," CDC spokesperson Kristen Nordlund said in a phone interview with PolitiFact.'
Nothing like asking the obvious perpetrator whether they are involved in committing the self-serving crime?
Well, that settles that now, doesn't it: it is clear that my post provided a "dangerously" accurate exposé of the CDC cover-up.
It is a glorious day when one's efforts are officially recognised and a single post is deemed so threatening to the preservation of regime falsehoods that a PolitiFact 'badge of honour' decreeing "FALSE" is awarded!
I recant nothing!
________________________________
* The Last America Vagabond, April 11, podcast on Listennotes.com archive: 'Michael Yeadon Interview — Former Pfizer VP Speaks out on Dangers of mRNA Vaccines & COVID Illusion'