PHARMA GODS AT WAR: AstraZeneca is a Dangerous Fizzer, but is Pfizer the Greater Danger?
PANDEMIC WRITINGS, Melbourne, Australia (2020-2022): piece originally published March 30, 2021
Yesterday, Canada suspended the use of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine for people under 55.
The Canadian ‘National Advisory Committee on Immunisation’ announced the suspension following concerns that, “there is substantial uncertainty about the benefit of providing AstraZeneca…vaccines… to adults under-55 given the potential risks.”1
Again, the expressed concern is the prevalence of ‘rare blood clots’ that are now estimated ‘as high as one in 100,000, much higher than the one-in-one-million risk believed before.’
When ‘perception management’ is essential to marketing and allaying vaccination hesitancy — the true risk of “rare blood clots” is undoubtedly much greater.
Germany has also paused administering AstraZeneca shots to patients under 60. Expressing ‘precautionary action,’ Berlin’s state hospital groups ‘stopped giving female staff under the age of 55 shots of AstraZeneca vaccine following further reports of a rare brain blood disorder (cerebral sinus vein thrombosis (CSVT).’
Most of the patients who developed clotting were women under-55, and upon developing clots experienced a fatality rate as high as 40%.
Alas, they should have taken their chances with the mortality of 0.02% generously offered by the rather benign coronavirus.
Previously, a January report from Germany’s Standing Vaccination Commission, concluded in an 88-page draft resolution that the ‘Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine is only 8% effective in people over 65…’ and that there was … ‘no basis for recommending the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine for the group of over 65-year-olds.2
It would be utterly preposterous to conclude that the only relevant age group likely to benefit from the AstraZeneca experimental vaccine (and not potentially die, or be left “virally vulnerable”) would be those over 55 and under-65.
AstraZeneca’s product is evidently a monumental failure, neither conferring successful immunity, nor protecting the most vulnerable, while also potentially killing those that were never truly vulnerable to begin with.
Interestingly, the media has recently propagated this dire perception and narrative: AstraZeneca and blood clots are now synonymous in the public mind.
It should be apparent that everything AstraZeneca purports to have achieved with their miraculous syringe is underscored by cynical marketing enabled by complicit and compromised governments, and a paranoid population ever-primed by colluding media.
Indeed, this is the modus operandi for all currently competing vaccine manufacturers.
However, it is suspicious that unfavourable media focus has only been on AstraZeneca, and what amounts to their traditional vaccine product, as opposed to Pfizer/BioNtech and Moderna, and their unproven mRNA ‘gene therapy’ that has been maiming and killing scores.
AstraZeneca’s offering is defective and undeniably harmful and ultimately unnecessary, but it is a known technology, and its effects can often be reversed and treated. When juxtaposed with Pfizer/BioNtech and Moderna’s products, AstraZeneca is the objectively “safer” vaccine.
The effects of the mRNA technology are irreversible, untreatable and largely unknown.
The Pfizer/BioNtech and Moderna vaccines produce a spike protein associated with the placenta, possibly rendering infertility (50% of rats during the trials were sterilised, many pregnant woman have had post-vaccine induced miscarriages); these mRNA vaccines are most likely loaded with experimental and nefarious nanotech (given the need for specially designed shipping containers and storage temperatures in an ultra-cold freezer at temperatures between -80ºC and -60ºC/, now improved at: -25ºC and -15ºC); they irreversibly tamper with DNA substitutions by messenger Ribonucleic Acid (RNA), tricking the immune system into endlessly generating a minuscule response to a ‘coronavirus infection’ to purportedly establish “immunity” and hopefully avoid an actual wild-infection; moreover, they potentially unlock (DNA) and reactivate historically dormant viruses (aided by mask incubation) that once ravaged humanity and have been encoded into the human genome due to evolutionary pandemic exposure, currently inactive, but prone to “accidental” re-activation, mutation and devastation.
When both the AstraZeneca and the various mRNA products are contrasted, despite the adverse reactions and resultant mortalities amounting from each, only one can cause an irreversible modification to the genome of the human species that may not be fully manifest for a generation.
Only one is truly experimental, and in all previous Phase 3 Trials (before being bioengineered specifically for COVID) the preliminary test results on animals (rats, ferrets, rabbits and monkeys) all appeared to have established permanent immunity and confirmed the success of the mRNA technology — but once these “inoculated and immune” animals encountered the actual wild virus: every single one died.
These mRNA companies conveniently skipped the Phase 3 Trial on animals, and in their hubris and haste, have substituted humans for the crucial and decisive Phase 3 animal trials.
Evil.
The uncharacteristic media exposure of AstraZeneca’s vaccine in Canada and Europe, (undeniably detrimental to their product and their profiteering) may be indicative of an orchestrated “play” for territory by the rival Pfizer Drug Cartel.
AstraZeneca is undoubtedly responsible for a diabolical syringe, but we must remain ever vigilant and wary of the endless power-struggles amongst the Pharmaceutical Gods, as they contest territory, strive to amass power and influence, and pit us against their products, vying for supreme dominance, while pitilessly toying with their ignorant playthings.
______________________________
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/30/canada-suspends-use-of-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-for-those-under-55?
https://greatgameindia.com/germany-covid-19-vaccine-effective/?