‘SMOKING CAUSES “STICKY BLOOD” AND BLOOD CLOTS’ (NOT ASTRAZENECA!): The Possible “Smokescreen” of the New Anti-Smoking Campaign

PANDEMIC WRITINGS, Melbourne, Australia (2020-2022): piece originally published March 28, 2021

On the 27th of February, approximately five days after the TGA provisionally approved the use of the AstraZeneca experiment for Australians, Quit Victoria launched a new “public education” anti-smoking campaign.

The focus of the campaign was based on 'new Australian research' that purportedly linked smoking with 'blood clots.'

The timing could not be more suspicious...

Airing on free-to-air television, the commercial ‘explains how within minutes of inhaling cigarette smoke, the blood becomes sticky, constricting the artery walls and making it harder to pump blood around the body. Sticky blood increases the chance of blood clots forming in the artery wall…’

Obviously this is pseudoscience at its fearful finest, but the fact that the promotion of such a claim coincides with the mass-vaccination of Australians with a vaccine associated with 'blood clots' should give pause.

Perhaps, there is more going on here?

The peculiar focus on “sticky blood” targets the one-in-ten Victorians who smoke daily, and are presumably at risk of a heart attack or stroke caused by ‘blood clots’ from cigarettes.

Those behind the curiously-timed campaign insist that ‘relatively few people know how cigarette smoke can clot the blood, which can lead to a heart attack even for people in their 30s and 40s.’

The claim of 'relatively few...know' is probably true, because all this constitutes newly introduced propaganda.

It is certainly uncanny that the rollout of the AstraZeneca experiment was recently suspended in Europe over an 'abundance of caution' that required a review of the numerous cases observed in those in their 30s and 40s who developed 'blood clotting' after vaccination.

Just over a week ago, thirteen European governments were unified in their concern about 'lethal blood clots' resulting from the AstraZeneca vaccine. It was no trivial fact that the European Union abruptly halted the European rollout of AstraZeneca’s experiment — the evidence must have been compelling and alarming.

No sooner had deeply troubling evidence emerged suggesting that there was a causation between a percentage of those vaccinated who then developed blood clots — the "trusted" European Medicines Agency (EMA) was entrusted to intervene with their golden rays and officially conceal any problematic evidence of harm, while blessing and elevating the lie of "safe."

Indeed, it was truly astounding that the EMA was able to conduct a preliminary review of the alarming ‘thrombocytopenic episodes’ (resulting in brain blood clots) from the AstraZeneca experiment in what amounted to a matter of days. It can be assumed that they actually did nothing of the sort, but merely submitted a pre-scripted response: "the jab was not associated with a higher risk of clots."

If you close your eyes there is nothing to see here!

It can be reasonably assumed that the truth pertaining to the actual prevalence of 'blood clots' arising in otherwise healthy young individuals has been cunningly suppressed.

It simply cannot be permitted to be otherwise.

Of course AstraZeneca's vaccine causes lethal 'blood clots' and a plethora of other ghoulish adverse reactions — it would be naive to disregard the evidence, and to flippantly dismiss the sheer gravity of a collective European decision to suspend the rollout of a vaccine amidst the crisis of a "pandemic."

Obviously, the European governments suspended the AstraZeneca vaccine because there was substantial evidence confirming causation beyond mere correlation. Surely, AstraZeneca, despite their official reassurances that their product 'does not cause blood clots’ — is entirely aware that it does (which has probably been known from early trials) and now must absolutely dismantle, obscure and deflect all evidence revealing direct causation.

To do otherwise would be catastrophic for business, and utterly ruinous to the future viability of AstraZeneca as one of the dominant Pharma Titans currently thrashing around in the sphere of public "health."

The colossus would collapse!

Now, the Australia Federal Government is inextricably entangled and contractually bound to advance, preserve and defend AstraZeneca due to their mutual business partnership.

Our compromised Prime Minster was incapable of casting doubt, and had to adamantly maintain that the AstraZeneca 'blood clot' concern was an 'overreaction', and that the product is unambiguously 'safe and effective.'

Sure, sure.

It should be obvious that given the stupendous Australian investment in developing and manufacturing, and the fact that our Federal Government looted $1.7 billion of Australian taxpayers money to purchase millions of doses and to fund two major production plants in Victoria to produce the AstraZeneca vaccine for the Asia Pacific Region - that everything must be done to prevent the "clotting" of this gargantuan profit artery.

It was inevitable that the rushed AstraZeneca vaccine would prove to be inherently problematic, and that it is likely little more than a vial of glorified snake oil laced with drops of venom.

And now we are witnessing the first results of the venom.

Given that the recently vaccinated are candidates of an uncertain medical experiment, it should be anticipated that adverse reactions and death will result. There is presently no pharmaceutical product that conforms with the true definition of ‘a safe and effective vaccine.' There is no actual vaccine, but rather, an ongoing experiment yielding uncertain results: blood clots being amongst them.

Now, unlike Europe, Australia does not have a "pandemic theatre," (merely theatre) as cases are currently non-existent, deaths and hospitalisations at zero; but the Government is still relentlessly and irrationally pushing the global vaccine agenda.

It can be logically deduced that the AstraZeneca experimental product is directly responsible for lethal ‘blood clots.’ It can also be reasonably surmised that the prevalence of ‘thrombocytopenic episodes’ (resulting in brain blood clots) far exceeds that which is officially admitted.

Many Australians will be duped into receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine, and it is certain that an unfortunate percentage will develop blood clots — some will merely experience a debilitating side effect, others will be completely sidelined by death.

The International Cabal of Pandemic Pushers have conveniently established that COVID also 'causes lethal blood clots' (is there anything this extraordinary disease cannot do in the minds of psychopaths?) and that it is actually impossible to objectively determine if the AstraZeneca jab was responsible, or whether the actual coronavirus caused the clotting (and associated deaths): now, this is their plausible excuse for Europeans.

Unlike Europe, in the absence of a "rampaging virus," a virus that supposedly 'causes clots,' Australia has a foreseeable problem: what might be causing post-vaccinated clotting when there is no virus to be assigned blame?

A solution might have already been devised by the government-affiliated and funded Anti-Smoking Crusaders as they seek to confuse, conceal and misdirect with an ulterior purpose:

A “smokescreen.”

______________________________

The Quit Victoria campaign: https://www.quit.org.au/articles/sticky-blood/?