TGA: FAILING AUSTRALIANS: Now You See it, Now You Don't

PANDEMIC WRITINGS, Melbourne, Australia (2020-2022): piece originally published September 4, 2021

Here is tremendous cause to be suspicious...

On the 19th of August, the Therapeutics Goods Administration (TGA) announced that 'due to strong public interest' they would now make reports of suspected vaccine side effects (including death) publicly available on a searchable database.

“Due to strong public interest in side effects relating to COVID-19 vaccinations, the TGA is now making reports of suspected side effects to vaccines and medicines publicly available in the Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN) 14 days after they are completed.”

The TGA has been entrusted to inform Australians with their weekly "safety report" as they monitor the National Vaccine Rollout of an unproven medical experiment. They officially granted 'provisional approval' to these "experiments," and they must ethically monitor the results of their decision and present this for general review.

It seems that this announcement was intended to alleviate public anxiety and vaccine hesitancy; support transparency; and act as a permanent reference and record that would provided a historic testament to the claim of "safe and effective."

Ultimately, it would showcase whether the TGA's initial assessment of "safe and effective" would prove to be true — or would need to be reversed. It would hold them to account.

Given the aggressive campaign to vaccinate all by "lockdown-siege" and incessant propaganda, fear-mongering and a looming threat of being excluded from an envisioned Biosecurity Apartheid State of segregation — surely this Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN) represented a much-need ethical approach.

However, despite announcing DAEN on August 19th, setting up the website and offering the means for the public to submit and register their crucial information (and for others to search), to date: "The Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN) is currently unavailable due to performance issues resulting from high rates of access. This is being investigated as a priority. We will provide further information on our website when it is available again."

It has been three weeks.

It remains 'unavailable due to performance issues resulting from high rates of access'... at a time when it is most needed — all should be done to ensure that this government website is available and accessible immediately.

Given that nothing has been done to rectify the situation, despite infinite available resources and what should be assumed to be an absolute priority of providing this service — it can only be assumed that this is deliberate, criminal, and an act of suppression.

This is all consistent with a policy of 'lying by omission.'

How incredibly convenient: a deliberate suppression of essential public information (assisting with 'informed consent') when such information is crucial, and may determine both future health, and lives.

All this reveals everything that needs to be known about the claim of "safe and effective."