DID THE 38-YEAR-OLD ADRIANA MIDORI TAKATA, REALLY DIE FROM DELTA?
PANDEMIC WRITINGS, Melbourne, Australia (2020-2022): piece originally published July 26, 2021
The death of Adriana Midori Takata, 38, is an undeniable tragedy that is being despicably exploited as a ‘grim reminder for young people’ of ‘the cruel disease.’1 We are informed that she had ‘no underlying health conditions,’ and that her death was defined as “just so quickly. So quickly, you know, how her body disintegrated. It’s just terrible.”
What are we not being informed about by deliberate omission?
Her death is being paraded by the abominable symbiosis of media-government ghouls as a “horrific COVID death,” suspiciously a “real life example” of the predictive ‘young woman gasping’ in a hospital bed TV commercial.
Statistically2, such a death is an anomaly, with COVID-19 now being scientifically recognised as having a lower mortality than seasonal influenza, and generally of no particular issue to most people of ‘a working age.’
With no intent to be insensitive, but driven primarily to ascertain the actual truth, there are a two lines of questioning that require immediate clarification:
A QUESTION OF HER VACCINATION STATUS:
Was Miss Takata vaccinated? Which vaccine? One, or two shots?
AstraZeneca is primarily linked to ‘blood clots,’ and Pfizer, ‘heart inflammation;’ however, both cause destructive clots and countless combinations of adverse reactions. The phenomenon of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE), in which a vaccinated person encounters a wild viral strain and is mortally overwhelmed by a cytokine storm of critical inflammation, is also highly possible. All previous experiments with mRNA Pfizer vaccines during Phase 3 Trials on animals resulted in perfect inoculation — alas, when the virus was eventually encountered in the wild, all animals died (ADE). These essential animal trials were purposely skipped for this particular vaccine — they went straight to the unwitting human test subject.
If the answer to any of these vaccine questions is a ‘yes,’ then Miss Takata did not die from COVID-19: the vaccine effectively facilitated the deterioration of her life — she was essentially a victim of pharmaceutical manslaughter.
A QUESTION OF HER HOSPITAL “TREATMENT”:
Was Miss Takata denied proven beneficial prophylactics (to promote the agenda of ‘a vaccine, or nothing’), and incorrectly intubated, induced into a coma, and mechanically forced to breath via barbaric ventilation? Did the hospital place her on a ventilator, despite having knowledge that patients placed on a ventilator have a mere 12-25% chance of survival, or, inversely, a 75-88% chance of a gruesome death (in which the body would ‘disintegrate’): if this were the case, then it can be assumed that Miss Takata was killed by her ventilation “treatment.”
So, pending further transparency and official answers to these crucial questions, it would currently be incorrect to promote Miss Takata’s death as the result of her contracting the Delta strain of COVID-19.
The probability that she was vaccinated (‘her boyfriend and flatmate, a nurse’), and the likelihood of her being placed on a ventilator — both seem highly likely.
Given this, it is also highly likely that a combination of these speculative events (vaccination or ventilation), or even one, or the other, would have contributed to her premature death.
Was it Delta, or, perhaps more accurately, was Miss Takata literally dealt death?
Only 6 deaths out of Australia’s 900 have been under the age of 49.