PRE-EMPTING & DISARMING THEIR WEAPONS OF COMPLIANCE: ILLEGAL FINES: 19,000 VIC Fines Issued, 845 Paid, Most Withdrawn.
PANDEMIC WRITINGS, Melbourne, Australia (2020-2022): piece originally published April 26, 2021
Ah, when a ‘State of Emergency’ is required to continue administering an ‘emergency authorised’ experimental vaccine, it should be apparent why magic “cases” turn up magically, right before the ‘State of Emergency’ has almost expired…
It has happened in Victoria, Queensland, and now Western Australia (SOE officially expired in WA on the EXACT date of the one case, 3-day lockdown — only to be renewed.)
Given Western Australia’s ludicrous ‘snap 3-day lockdown,' the irrational restrictions, and the fines issued to those caught in breach of the diktats — Victorians need to remain vigilant, and strategically prepared.
Victoria’s ‘State of Emergency’ is due to be renewed over the Mother’s Day Weekend.
We can pre-empt and disarm future lockdowns if we disarm their ‘weapons of compliance.’
During this period of relative normality, we have an opportunity to circulate information, raise awareness, and to fortify and secure our reclaimed ‘freedom territory’ in this Mind War.
Alongside Police State authoritarianism, media sensationalism, viral paranoia and the “policing” imposed by others — the Victorian Government achieved general compliance with the threat of fines.
This is a key weapon.
During a bleak period in which employment was terminated, disrupted or uncertain, and income was vastly reduced by demeaning welfare payments — such fines issued by the VicPol Enforcers were deliberately cruel by design. They were intended to assure absolute compliance by fear of crippling penalty.
These irrational and exorbitant fines were all illegal. If challenged, they were hastily withdrawn, as a Magistrates Court hearing would have established a precedent (the illegality of first issuing the fine) that would have collapsed the entire ruse.
Many Australian media outlets reported on the 17th of January that ‘police drop most COVID-19 fines and hand out cautions.’1
Apparently, ‘19,000 penalty notices totalling 27 million had been issued for breaches of Chief Health Officer orders,’ which included $200 for not wearing a mask; $1652 for failing to stay at home; and $4957 for those caught unlawfully gathering.
Only 845 were paid.
‘Police Association Victoria secretary Wayne Gatt said the decision had inflamed tensions within the force after officers spent months enforcing the deeply unpopular COVID measures.
"Our members were asked to do a thankless job by the government and they did that," he said.
"If offenders form a view from this experience that penalties will be readily converted to cautions or diversions as a matter of course, then that sends a concerning message. We want to encourage wilful compliance and not encourage civil disobedience."’
‘Wilful compliance’ would naturally come from a reasonable determination that our government was not lying, and that the actual threat was indeed real, and not agenda-driven. To many, it was soon apparent from the onset that civil disobedience was necessary to counter the encroaching tyranny and the brazen play for power.
Predictably, despite Police Association Victoria secretary Wayne Gatt having given an unambiguous and official response to the decision, a day later, the media was forced to issue a clumsy and unconvincing retraction: ‘Victoria Police says unpaid COVID-19 fines will be prosecuted, blames a ‘guidance note' for confusion.’2
There was no confusion. The retraction was bunk.
Obviously, the Andrews’ Government panicked. They surely realised the potential for resistance to future tyrannical governance should the general public become aware of the farce that the 'vast majority of fines will be abandoned and never collected.’ Such an understanding would undermine the threat of receiving similar fines under identical circumstances; and effectively disarm the compliance-factor essential for imposing future lockdown plans (i.e. the forthcoming, pre-determined, vaccine marketing ‘snap-5-day lockdown’ beginning Valentine’s Day weekend.)
The fines issued during our lockdown periods were all illegal. Under such criminal governance, directed by an overarching criminal agenda — there was truly no related criminal act that was legally finable.
They know it; and WE must know it!
Andrews is still at the bottom of the stairs; and together we can make sure he does not reach for the balustrade and start ascending again.
______________________________