5 Comments

Hi Stephen, just discovered you on Twitter.

You're doing brilliant articles mate. Thanks for fighting back against this evil cabal of globalists who are trying to turn our land down under into a communist state.

keep up the great work.

Ivan M. Paton

Expand full comment

As Noongar in WA is covering a rich commodity in the ground, Eastern Marr Native Title covers a commodity on the ground. A seriously important dairy region, like Gippsland. And no doubt the Great Ocean Road will be tolled, until it is closed for the 15 min cities.

Expand full comment

Perrottet`s people was my family and friends..we donkey voted...anything but him.He was a gutless puppet with a corrupt govt that kept getting caught in dodgy deals...

Expand full comment
author

I have no doubt that Perrottet and his government were absolutely awash in corruption, but that is true for EVERY state government currently governing on behalf of the Corporatocracy that owns Australia. The Corporatocracy controls the media, controls the narrative, and is effectively the gatekeeper of all revelations of corruption on all owned leaders – they could have kept the gate closed. Thus, in my opinion, the Corporatocracy chose to use the media to remove him, rather than to protect him (like other premiers). Sure, he may have been incompetent and despised by many, but that is also true for most Western leaders at present. It is also likely that the alleged instances of ‘personal corruption’ (conveniently emerging prior to the election) might have been fed to the media to benefit his enemies and rivals (although I am by no means invested in him as being a “good guy.”)

During the Pandemic, Australian Premiers were issued with a National Cabinet directive (demanded by the Transnational Pharmaceutical Cartels) to coerce every citizen to submit to vaccination. The lockdown-siege was clearly a psychological tactic to break the resistance of the people to the marketing of an undesired, ineffective and ultimately dangerous experimental product. Although Perrottet was inexorably bound by the same demands imposed upon all Premiers, he did give an exit date for the Vaccine Economy and the Vaccine Passport system that was imposed in his state. He gave the unvaccinated hope. In contrast, Dan Andrews was absolutely ruthless, and delighted in a truly sadistic approach of terrorizing Victorians with the proclamation that his Vaccine Economy was here to stay, may last years, and that the unvaccinated would be permanently locked-out of society and the economy. Andrews also implied at the time that the current Vaccine Passport would not be scrapped, but, rather, a mandatory booster passport would be necessary in the coming months and years, suggesting a permanency to his tyrannical Vaccine Economy.

Andrews is perhaps the most corrupt and loathed politician in Australian history – and, yet, he prevailed during the election, whereas Perrottet was removed. Andrews was once again “selected” (and rewarded for his cruelty), and I believe that Perrottet was “selected against” by the Corporatocracy to paint Australia Red.

A Red Australia will facilitate the UN takeover of our lands without political obstruction from nominal opposition (which might slow, or completely stall the plan.) Perrottet seemingly supported ‘The Voice,’ but remained opposed to beginning the process of Treaty (the only state to maintain this oppositional stance). I have argued (especially in this piece) that The Voice is the essential instrument for Treaty to be ratified, and that all states and territories have been targeted for acquisition by the UN-Globalists by a Treaty land grab.

…I believe Perrottet’s obstinate resistance to begin the process of Treaty, and the fact that he was a Pro-Trump Christian Conservative (at least nominally) were fundamental to his removal. They are all corrupt - we only learn of the depths of their corruption, and the extent to which they have been compromised when it benefits the Corporatocracy to remove them.

Expand full comment